Review




Structured Review

Proteintech flag tag
Flag Tag, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1247 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/flag tag/product/Proteintech
Average 96 stars, based on 1247 article reviews
flag tag - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
96/100 stars

Images



Similar Products

99
Cell Signaling Technology Inc flag
Flag, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/flag/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
flag - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti flag
Mettl8 promotes m 3 C modification of Tcf7 mRNA and its genome-specific loops of Tox in CD8 + T cells. (A) Venn plot illustrates the overlap of downregulated genes from RNA-seq, m 3 C-seq, and Mettl8-binding genes from RIP-seq. (B) Mettl8 occupancy at the Tcf7 gene loci is revealed through m 3 C-seq (WT and Mettl8 −/− ) of EG7-OVA tumor-infiltrating OT-I cells and RIP-seq (Mettl8-tdTomato-Flag) of B16F10 tumor-infiltrating CD44 + CD8 + T cells. The binding peaks on Tcf7 loci are depicted. The m 3 C tracks are all plotted on a consistent scale. (C) The RNA decay assay demonstrates the remaining Tcf7 mRNA of CD8 + T cells from the spleens of WT and Mettl8 −/− mice detected by qRT-PCR, normalized to t = 0. (D) Heatmaps display changes in total Tcf1-targeting genes between WT and Mettl8 −/− EG7-OVA tumor-infiltrating OT-I cells and Mettl8-targeting genes in B16F10 tumor-infiltrating CD44 + CD8 + T cells of Mettl8-tdTomato-Flag mice as detected by CUT&Tag. (E) Diamond graphs exhibit chromatin interactions in WT and Mettl8 −/− tumor-infiltrating OT-I cells at the Tox gene loci (top), with CUT&Tag and ATAC-seq tracks, and gene structures on the bottom. An enlarged view highlights the signal profiles across the Tox gene region. (F) co-IP of Tcf1 <t>by</t> <t>anti-Flag</t> magnetic beads in CD3 + T cells from the spleens of Mettl8-tdTomato-Flag (RPT) and WT mice. IB, immunoblot. (G) co-IP of Tcf1 by Flag-tagged Mettl8 protein with anti-Flag magnetic beads after co-transfection into HEK293T cells. (H) Single-cell transcription levels of representative genes illustrated in the UMAP plot. Transcription levels are color coded: gray, not expressed; blue, expressed. (I) Schematic diagram of the tumor model: Mettl8 fl/fl Cd4 cre mice were subcutaneously injected with 2 × 10 5 B16F10 cells and harvested after 13 days. (J) Representative flow cytometry plots and cumulative data show the frequency of Tcf1 + Tox + cells gated on tumor-infiltrating CD8 + CD44 + T cells (right). n = 6 per group. (K) Schematic diagram of the OT-I–transferred tumor model: CD45.1 mice were subcutaneously injected with 2 × 10 5 EG7-OVA cells, followed by 2 × 10 6 WT or Mettl8 −/− OT-I cells transfer at 9 dpi. Mice were harvested at 21 dpi. Representative flow cytometry plots and cumulative data show the frequency of Tox + cells gated on Tcf1 + OT-I cells. n = 6 per group. (L) The MFI of Tox gated on Tcf1 + OT-I cells of the mice in K. n = 6 per group. Data are representative of two independent experiments. P value was calculated by two-tailed Student’s t test; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ****P < 0.0001. Source data are available for this figure: .
Anti Flag, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti flag/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti flag - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Cell Signaling Technology Inc flag tag
Mettl8 promotes m 3 C modification of Tcf7 mRNA and its genome-specific loops of Tox in CD8 + T cells. (A) Venn plot illustrates the overlap of downregulated genes from RNA-seq, m 3 C-seq, and Mettl8-binding genes from RIP-seq. (B) Mettl8 occupancy at the Tcf7 gene loci is revealed through m 3 C-seq (WT and Mettl8 −/− ) of EG7-OVA tumor-infiltrating OT-I cells and RIP-seq (Mettl8-tdTomato-Flag) of B16F10 tumor-infiltrating CD44 + CD8 + T cells. The binding peaks on Tcf7 loci are depicted. The m 3 C tracks are all plotted on a consistent scale. (C) The RNA decay assay demonstrates the remaining Tcf7 mRNA of CD8 + T cells from the spleens of WT and Mettl8 −/− mice detected by qRT-PCR, normalized to t = 0. (D) Heatmaps display changes in total Tcf1-targeting genes between WT and Mettl8 −/− EG7-OVA tumor-infiltrating OT-I cells and Mettl8-targeting genes in B16F10 tumor-infiltrating CD44 + CD8 + T cells of Mettl8-tdTomato-Flag mice as detected by CUT&Tag. (E) Diamond graphs exhibit chromatin interactions in WT and Mettl8 −/− tumor-infiltrating OT-I cells at the Tox gene loci (top), with CUT&Tag and ATAC-seq tracks, and gene structures on the bottom. An enlarged view highlights the signal profiles across the Tox gene region. (F) co-IP of Tcf1 <t>by</t> <t>anti-Flag</t> magnetic beads in CD3 + T cells from the spleens of Mettl8-tdTomato-Flag (RPT) and WT mice. IB, immunoblot. (G) co-IP of Tcf1 by Flag-tagged Mettl8 protein with anti-Flag magnetic beads after co-transfection into HEK293T cells. (H) Single-cell transcription levels of representative genes illustrated in the UMAP plot. Transcription levels are color coded: gray, not expressed; blue, expressed. (I) Schematic diagram of the tumor model: Mettl8 fl/fl Cd4 cre mice were subcutaneously injected with 2 × 10 5 B16F10 cells and harvested after 13 days. (J) Representative flow cytometry plots and cumulative data show the frequency of Tcf1 + Tox + cells gated on tumor-infiltrating CD8 + CD44 + T cells (right). n = 6 per group. (K) Schematic diagram of the OT-I–transferred tumor model: CD45.1 mice were subcutaneously injected with 2 × 10 5 EG7-OVA cells, followed by 2 × 10 6 WT or Mettl8 −/− OT-I cells transfer at 9 dpi. Mice were harvested at 21 dpi. Representative flow cytometry plots and cumulative data show the frequency of Tox + cells gated on Tcf1 + OT-I cells. n = 6 per group. (L) The MFI of Tox gated on Tcf1 + OT-I cells of the mice in K. n = 6 per group. Data are representative of two independent experiments. P value was calculated by two-tailed Student’s t test; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ****P < 0.0001. Source data are available for this figure: .
Flag Tag, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/flag tag/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
flag tag - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Proteintech flag tag
Mettl8 promotes m 3 C modification of Tcf7 mRNA and its genome-specific loops of Tox in CD8 + T cells. (A) Venn plot illustrates the overlap of downregulated genes from RNA-seq, m 3 C-seq, and Mettl8-binding genes from RIP-seq. (B) Mettl8 occupancy at the Tcf7 gene loci is revealed through m 3 C-seq (WT and Mettl8 −/− ) of EG7-OVA tumor-infiltrating OT-I cells and RIP-seq (Mettl8-tdTomato-Flag) of B16F10 tumor-infiltrating CD44 + CD8 + T cells. The binding peaks on Tcf7 loci are depicted. The m 3 C tracks are all plotted on a consistent scale. (C) The RNA decay assay demonstrates the remaining Tcf7 mRNA of CD8 + T cells from the spleens of WT and Mettl8 −/− mice detected by qRT-PCR, normalized to t = 0. (D) Heatmaps display changes in total Tcf1-targeting genes between WT and Mettl8 −/− EG7-OVA tumor-infiltrating OT-I cells and Mettl8-targeting genes in B16F10 tumor-infiltrating CD44 + CD8 + T cells of Mettl8-tdTomato-Flag mice as detected by CUT&Tag. (E) Diamond graphs exhibit chromatin interactions in WT and Mettl8 −/− tumor-infiltrating OT-I cells at the Tox gene loci (top), with CUT&Tag and ATAC-seq tracks, and gene structures on the bottom. An enlarged view highlights the signal profiles across the Tox gene region. (F) co-IP of Tcf1 <t>by</t> <t>anti-Flag</t> magnetic beads in CD3 + T cells from the spleens of Mettl8-tdTomato-Flag (RPT) and WT mice. IB, immunoblot. (G) co-IP of Tcf1 by Flag-tagged Mettl8 protein with anti-Flag magnetic beads after co-transfection into HEK293T cells. (H) Single-cell transcription levels of representative genes illustrated in the UMAP plot. Transcription levels are color coded: gray, not expressed; blue, expressed. (I) Schematic diagram of the tumor model: Mettl8 fl/fl Cd4 cre mice were subcutaneously injected with 2 × 10 5 B16F10 cells and harvested after 13 days. (J) Representative flow cytometry plots and cumulative data show the frequency of Tcf1 + Tox + cells gated on tumor-infiltrating CD8 + CD44 + T cells (right). n = 6 per group. (K) Schematic diagram of the OT-I–transferred tumor model: CD45.1 mice were subcutaneously injected with 2 × 10 5 EG7-OVA cells, followed by 2 × 10 6 WT or Mettl8 −/− OT-I cells transfer at 9 dpi. Mice were harvested at 21 dpi. Representative flow cytometry plots and cumulative data show the frequency of Tox + cells gated on Tcf1 + OT-I cells. n = 6 per group. (L) The MFI of Tox gated on Tcf1 + OT-I cells of the mice in K. n = 6 per group. Data are representative of two independent experiments. P value was calculated by two-tailed Student’s t test; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ****P < 0.0001. Source data are available for this figure: .
Flag Tag, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/flag tag/product/Proteintech
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
flag tag - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Proteintech anti flag
Mettl8 promotes m 3 C modification of Tcf7 mRNA and its genome-specific loops of Tox in CD8 + T cells. (A) Venn plot illustrates the overlap of downregulated genes from RNA-seq, m 3 C-seq, and Mettl8-binding genes from RIP-seq. (B) Mettl8 occupancy at the Tcf7 gene loci is revealed through m 3 C-seq (WT and Mettl8 −/− ) of EG7-OVA tumor-infiltrating OT-I cells and RIP-seq (Mettl8-tdTomato-Flag) of B16F10 tumor-infiltrating CD44 + CD8 + T cells. The binding peaks on Tcf7 loci are depicted. The m 3 C tracks are all plotted on a consistent scale. (C) The RNA decay assay demonstrates the remaining Tcf7 mRNA of CD8 + T cells from the spleens of WT and Mettl8 −/− mice detected by qRT-PCR, normalized to t = 0. (D) Heatmaps display changes in total Tcf1-targeting genes between WT and Mettl8 −/− EG7-OVA tumor-infiltrating OT-I cells and Mettl8-targeting genes in B16F10 tumor-infiltrating CD44 + CD8 + T cells of Mettl8-tdTomato-Flag mice as detected by CUT&Tag. (E) Diamond graphs exhibit chromatin interactions in WT and Mettl8 −/− tumor-infiltrating OT-I cells at the Tox gene loci (top), with CUT&Tag and ATAC-seq tracks, and gene structures on the bottom. An enlarged view highlights the signal profiles across the Tox gene region. (F) co-IP of Tcf1 <t>by</t> <t>anti-Flag</t> magnetic beads in CD3 + T cells from the spleens of Mettl8-tdTomato-Flag (RPT) and WT mice. IB, immunoblot. (G) co-IP of Tcf1 by Flag-tagged Mettl8 protein with anti-Flag magnetic beads after co-transfection into HEK293T cells. (H) Single-cell transcription levels of representative genes illustrated in the UMAP plot. Transcription levels are color coded: gray, not expressed; blue, expressed. (I) Schematic diagram of the tumor model: Mettl8 fl/fl Cd4 cre mice were subcutaneously injected with 2 × 10 5 B16F10 cells and harvested after 13 days. (J) Representative flow cytometry plots and cumulative data show the frequency of Tcf1 + Tox + cells gated on tumor-infiltrating CD8 + CD44 + T cells (right). n = 6 per group. (K) Schematic diagram of the OT-I–transferred tumor model: CD45.1 mice were subcutaneously injected with 2 × 10 5 EG7-OVA cells, followed by 2 × 10 6 WT or Mettl8 −/− OT-I cells transfer at 9 dpi. Mice were harvested at 21 dpi. Representative flow cytometry plots and cumulative data show the frequency of Tox + cells gated on Tcf1 + OT-I cells. n = 6 per group. (L) The MFI of Tox gated on Tcf1 + OT-I cells of the mice in K. n = 6 per group. Data are representative of two independent experiments. P value was calculated by two-tailed Student’s t test; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ****P < 0.0001. Source data are available for this figure: .
Anti Flag, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti flag/product/Proteintech
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti flag - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Proteintech antibodies against flag
USP25 interacts with RIPK1 through the USP domain. (A) Schematic diagram of the proteomic screening for USP25-interacting proteins. (B) Two-dimensional plot of USP25-binding proteins, with the Y axis showing protein intensity and the X axis showing protein molecular weight. (C) List of potential substrates with unique peptides ≥2 identified by the mass spectrometry analysis. (D–E) Whole cell lysates of BMDMs were immunoprecipitated with anti-USP25 (D) or anti-RIPK1 (E) antibodies, followed by Western blot analysis. Rabbit IgG served as negative control. (F–G) HEK293 cells were co-transfected with <t>FLAG-USP25</t> and MYC-RIPK1 plasmids for 24 h. Whole-cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with <t>anti-FLAG</t> (F) or anti-MYC (G) antibodies, followed by Western blot analysis. (H) BMDMs were left untreated or treated with ox-LDL (50 μg/mL) for 30 min before lysis. Whole-cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-USP25 antibody, followed by Western blot analysis. (I) Subcellular distribution of USP25 (red) and RIPK1 (green) in BMDMs treated with or without ox-LDL (50 μg/mL) for 30 min was detected by immunofluorescence. Scale bar: 5 μm. (J) Schematic diagram of structural domains and truncation mutants of USP25. (K) HEK293 cells were co-transfected with indicated plasmids for 24 h. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG antibody and further analysed by Western blot with indicated antibodies.
Antibodies Against Flag, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/antibodies against flag/product/Proteintech
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
antibodies against flag - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Cell Signaling Technology Inc antibodies against flag
USP25 interacts with RIPK1 through the USP domain. (A) Schematic diagram of the proteomic screening for USP25-interacting proteins. (B) Two-dimensional plot of USP25-binding proteins, with the Y axis showing protein intensity and the X axis showing protein molecular weight. (C) List of potential substrates with unique peptides ≥2 identified by the mass spectrometry analysis. (D–E) Whole cell lysates of BMDMs were immunoprecipitated with anti-USP25 (D) or anti-RIPK1 (E) antibodies, followed by Western blot analysis. Rabbit IgG served as negative control. (F–G) HEK293 cells were co-transfected with <t>FLAG-USP25</t> and MYC-RIPK1 plasmids for 24 h. Whole-cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with <t>anti-FLAG</t> (F) or anti-MYC (G) antibodies, followed by Western blot analysis. (H) BMDMs were left untreated or treated with ox-LDL (50 μg/mL) for 30 min before lysis. Whole-cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-USP25 antibody, followed by Western blot analysis. (I) Subcellular distribution of USP25 (red) and RIPK1 (green) in BMDMs treated with or without ox-LDL (50 μg/mL) for 30 min was detected by immunofluorescence. Scale bar: 5 μm. (J) Schematic diagram of structural domains and truncation mutants of USP25. (K) HEK293 cells were co-transfected with indicated plasmids for 24 h. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG antibody and further analysed by Western blot with indicated antibodies.
Antibodies Against Flag, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/antibodies against flag/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
antibodies against flag - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Mettl8 promotes m 3 C modification of Tcf7 mRNA and its genome-specific loops of Tox in CD8 + T cells. (A) Venn plot illustrates the overlap of downregulated genes from RNA-seq, m 3 C-seq, and Mettl8-binding genes from RIP-seq. (B) Mettl8 occupancy at the Tcf7 gene loci is revealed through m 3 C-seq (WT and Mettl8 −/− ) of EG7-OVA tumor-infiltrating OT-I cells and RIP-seq (Mettl8-tdTomato-Flag) of B16F10 tumor-infiltrating CD44 + CD8 + T cells. The binding peaks on Tcf7 loci are depicted. The m 3 C tracks are all plotted on a consistent scale. (C) The RNA decay assay demonstrates the remaining Tcf7 mRNA of CD8 + T cells from the spleens of WT and Mettl8 −/− mice detected by qRT-PCR, normalized to t = 0. (D) Heatmaps display changes in total Tcf1-targeting genes between WT and Mettl8 −/− EG7-OVA tumor-infiltrating OT-I cells and Mettl8-targeting genes in B16F10 tumor-infiltrating CD44 + CD8 + T cells of Mettl8-tdTomato-Flag mice as detected by CUT&Tag. (E) Diamond graphs exhibit chromatin interactions in WT and Mettl8 −/− tumor-infiltrating OT-I cells at the Tox gene loci (top), with CUT&Tag and ATAC-seq tracks, and gene structures on the bottom. An enlarged view highlights the signal profiles across the Tox gene region. (F) co-IP of Tcf1 by anti-Flag magnetic beads in CD3 + T cells from the spleens of Mettl8-tdTomato-Flag (RPT) and WT mice. IB, immunoblot. (G) co-IP of Tcf1 by Flag-tagged Mettl8 protein with anti-Flag magnetic beads after co-transfection into HEK293T cells. (H) Single-cell transcription levels of representative genes illustrated in the UMAP plot. Transcription levels are color coded: gray, not expressed; blue, expressed. (I) Schematic diagram of the tumor model: Mettl8 fl/fl Cd4 cre mice were subcutaneously injected with 2 × 10 5 B16F10 cells and harvested after 13 days. (J) Representative flow cytometry plots and cumulative data show the frequency of Tcf1 + Tox + cells gated on tumor-infiltrating CD8 + CD44 + T cells (right). n = 6 per group. (K) Schematic diagram of the OT-I–transferred tumor model: CD45.1 mice were subcutaneously injected with 2 × 10 5 EG7-OVA cells, followed by 2 × 10 6 WT or Mettl8 −/− OT-I cells transfer at 9 dpi. Mice were harvested at 21 dpi. Representative flow cytometry plots and cumulative data show the frequency of Tox + cells gated on Tcf1 + OT-I cells. n = 6 per group. (L) The MFI of Tox gated on Tcf1 + OT-I cells of the mice in K. n = 6 per group. Data are representative of two independent experiments. P value was calculated by two-tailed Student’s t test; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ****P < 0.0001. Source data are available for this figure: .

Journal: The Journal of Experimental Medicine

Article Title: Targeting Mettl8-Tcf1 axis promotes CD8 + T PEX differentiation and antitumor immunity

doi: 10.1084/jem.20250424

Figure Lengend Snippet: Mettl8 promotes m 3 C modification of Tcf7 mRNA and its genome-specific loops of Tox in CD8 + T cells. (A) Venn plot illustrates the overlap of downregulated genes from RNA-seq, m 3 C-seq, and Mettl8-binding genes from RIP-seq. (B) Mettl8 occupancy at the Tcf7 gene loci is revealed through m 3 C-seq (WT and Mettl8 −/− ) of EG7-OVA tumor-infiltrating OT-I cells and RIP-seq (Mettl8-tdTomato-Flag) of B16F10 tumor-infiltrating CD44 + CD8 + T cells. The binding peaks on Tcf7 loci are depicted. The m 3 C tracks are all plotted on a consistent scale. (C) The RNA decay assay demonstrates the remaining Tcf7 mRNA of CD8 + T cells from the spleens of WT and Mettl8 −/− mice detected by qRT-PCR, normalized to t = 0. (D) Heatmaps display changes in total Tcf1-targeting genes between WT and Mettl8 −/− EG7-OVA tumor-infiltrating OT-I cells and Mettl8-targeting genes in B16F10 tumor-infiltrating CD44 + CD8 + T cells of Mettl8-tdTomato-Flag mice as detected by CUT&Tag. (E) Diamond graphs exhibit chromatin interactions in WT and Mettl8 −/− tumor-infiltrating OT-I cells at the Tox gene loci (top), with CUT&Tag and ATAC-seq tracks, and gene structures on the bottom. An enlarged view highlights the signal profiles across the Tox gene region. (F) co-IP of Tcf1 by anti-Flag magnetic beads in CD3 + T cells from the spleens of Mettl8-tdTomato-Flag (RPT) and WT mice. IB, immunoblot. (G) co-IP of Tcf1 by Flag-tagged Mettl8 protein with anti-Flag magnetic beads after co-transfection into HEK293T cells. (H) Single-cell transcription levels of representative genes illustrated in the UMAP plot. Transcription levels are color coded: gray, not expressed; blue, expressed. (I) Schematic diagram of the tumor model: Mettl8 fl/fl Cd4 cre mice were subcutaneously injected with 2 × 10 5 B16F10 cells and harvested after 13 days. (J) Representative flow cytometry plots and cumulative data show the frequency of Tcf1 + Tox + cells gated on tumor-infiltrating CD8 + CD44 + T cells (right). n = 6 per group. (K) Schematic diagram of the OT-I–transferred tumor model: CD45.1 mice were subcutaneously injected with 2 × 10 5 EG7-OVA cells, followed by 2 × 10 6 WT or Mettl8 −/− OT-I cells transfer at 9 dpi. Mice were harvested at 21 dpi. Representative flow cytometry plots and cumulative data show the frequency of Tox + cells gated on Tcf1 + OT-I cells. n = 6 per group. (L) The MFI of Tox gated on Tcf1 + OT-I cells of the mice in K. n = 6 per group. Data are representative of two independent experiments. P value was calculated by two-tailed Student’s t test; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ****P < 0.0001. Source data are available for this figure: .

Article Snippet: In briefly, cells were sorted enriched by ConA-magnetic beads and resuspended in wash Buffer (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.5; 150 mM NaCI, 0.5 mM spermidine; 1× protease inhibitor cocktail; 0.05% digitonin) and then incubated overnight with anti-Tcf1 (1:50, C63D9, cat. no. 2203; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-H3K27ac (1:50, cat. no. ab4729; Abcam), or anti-Flag (1:50, D6W5B, cat. no. 14793; Cell Signaling Technology).

Techniques: Modification, RNA Sequencing, Binding Assay, Quantitative RT-PCR, Co-Immunoprecipitation Assay, Magnetic Beads, Western Blot, Cotransfection, Single Cell, Injection, Flow Cytometry, Two Tailed Test

USP25 interacts with RIPK1 through the USP domain. (A) Schematic diagram of the proteomic screening for USP25-interacting proteins. (B) Two-dimensional plot of USP25-binding proteins, with the Y axis showing protein intensity and the X axis showing protein molecular weight. (C) List of potential substrates with unique peptides ≥2 identified by the mass spectrometry analysis. (D–E) Whole cell lysates of BMDMs were immunoprecipitated with anti-USP25 (D) or anti-RIPK1 (E) antibodies, followed by Western blot analysis. Rabbit IgG served as negative control. (F–G) HEK293 cells were co-transfected with FLAG-USP25 and MYC-RIPK1 plasmids for 24 h. Whole-cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG (F) or anti-MYC (G) antibodies, followed by Western blot analysis. (H) BMDMs were left untreated or treated with ox-LDL (50 μg/mL) for 30 min before lysis. Whole-cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-USP25 antibody, followed by Western blot analysis. (I) Subcellular distribution of USP25 (red) and RIPK1 (green) in BMDMs treated with or without ox-LDL (50 μg/mL) for 30 min was detected by immunofluorescence. Scale bar: 5 μm. (J) Schematic diagram of structural domains and truncation mutants of USP25. (K) HEK293 cells were co-transfected with indicated plasmids for 24 h. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG antibody and further analysed by Western blot with indicated antibodies.

Journal: eBioMedicine

Article Title: USP25 regulates atherosclerosis by restricting RIPK1-mediated inflammatory responses

doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2026.106213

Figure Lengend Snippet: USP25 interacts with RIPK1 through the USP domain. (A) Schematic diagram of the proteomic screening for USP25-interacting proteins. (B) Two-dimensional plot of USP25-binding proteins, with the Y axis showing protein intensity and the X axis showing protein molecular weight. (C) List of potential substrates with unique peptides ≥2 identified by the mass spectrometry analysis. (D–E) Whole cell lysates of BMDMs were immunoprecipitated with anti-USP25 (D) or anti-RIPK1 (E) antibodies, followed by Western blot analysis. Rabbit IgG served as negative control. (F–G) HEK293 cells were co-transfected with FLAG-USP25 and MYC-RIPK1 plasmids for 24 h. Whole-cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG (F) or anti-MYC (G) antibodies, followed by Western blot analysis. (H) BMDMs were left untreated or treated with ox-LDL (50 μg/mL) for 30 min before lysis. Whole-cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-USP25 antibody, followed by Western blot analysis. (I) Subcellular distribution of USP25 (red) and RIPK1 (green) in BMDMs treated with or without ox-LDL (50 μg/mL) for 30 min was detected by immunofluorescence. Scale bar: 5 μm. (J) Schematic diagram of structural domains and truncation mutants of USP25. (K) HEK293 cells were co-transfected with indicated plasmids for 24 h. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG antibody and further analysed by Western blot with indicated antibodies.

Article Snippet: Antibodies against FLAG (Cat#: 20543-1-AP, 1: 1000, RRID: AB_11232216 ), MYC (Cat#: 60003-2-Ig, 1: 1000, RRID: AB_2734122 ), HA (Cat#: 51064-2-AP, 1: 1000, RRID: AB_11042321 ), CD36 (Cat#: 18836-1-AP, 1:1000, RRID: AB_10597244 ), ASK1 (Cat#: 28201-1-AP, 1: 1000, RRID: AB_2782957 ), MLKL (Cat#: 66675-1-Ig, 1:1000, RRID: AB_2882029 ), and p-ASK1 (Cat#: 28846-1-AP, 1: 1000, RRID: AB_2881220 ) were purchased from Proteintech (Wuhan, China).

Techniques: Binding Assay, Molecular Weight, Mass Spectrometry, Immunoprecipitation, Western Blot, Negative Control, Transfection, Lysis, Immunofluorescence